Obstetric Forceps Delivery
 

Obstetric Forceps Delivery

   

Operative Vaginal Delivery - Forceps Delivery - Vacuum Extraction Delivery

Home
Pregnancy Calendar
Pregnancy
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy Date Calculator
Symptoms & Signs
Pregnancy - Antenatal Care
Pregnancy
Gestational Age
Gestational Age Intro
Morning Sickness
Smoking
Obesity
Diabetes in Pregnancy
Gestational Diabetes
Liver
Infections
Teen Pregnancy
Depression in Pregnancy
Headache
PET Definitions
Aetiology - Pre-Eclampsia and Eclampsia
Antepartum Haemorrhage
Intrautrine Growth Restriction - IUGR
Breech Presentation
Twins
Teenage Pregnancy.
Thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy and the puerperium
Premature Labour
Post-Maturity
Induction Of Labour
Planned Delivery
Water Birth
Operative Vaginal Delivery-Forceps Delivery
Vacuum Extraction Delivery
Shoulder Dystocia
Caesarean Section
Obstetric Emergencies
Puerperium
Post-Partum Haemorrhage
Uterine Rupture
Childbirth
Perinatal Mortality
Breast Feeding

 

OPERATIVE VAGINAL DELIVERY

 

 

 BJOG. 2003 Jun;110(6):610-5.

Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care.
Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Patel R, Verity L, Swingler R.

Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, UK.

Objectives:

To assess the maternal and neonatal morbidity following operative delivery in the second stage of labour in relation to the standard of obstetric care.

Design:

Cohort study.

Setting:

Maternity units in two teaching hospitals in Bristol, United Kingdom. Three hundred and ninety-three women with term, singleton, cephalic pregnancies who required operative delivery in theatre at full dilatation between February 1999 and February 2000.

Methods:

Morbidity was compared for completed instrumental delivery, failed instrumental delivery and immediate caesarean section in relation to duration of second stage of labour, number of pulls at attempted instrumental delivery, number of instruments used and operator experience. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal trauma, admission to special care baby unit, neonatal trauma.

Results:

Failed instrumental delivery after a long second stage of labour was associated with increased maternal trauma (adjusted odds ratios [OR] 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1, 16.5). More than three pulls at attempted instrumental delivery was associated with increased neonatal trauma for completed (adjusted OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.6, 9.5) and failed deliveries (adjusted OR 7.2, 95% CI 2.1, 24.0). Babies delivered after failed instrumental delivery with more than three pulls were at increased risk of admission to special care baby unit (adjusted OR 6.2, 95% CI 1.6, 22.8) The use of multiple instruments was associated with increased neonatal trauma (adjusted OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5, 6.8; adjusted OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.3, 14.4, for completed and failed deliveries, respectively). Excessive pulls and multiple instrument use were associated with an initial attempt at vaginal delivery by an inexperienced operator, 25/48 (52%) and 34/75 (45%).

Conclusions:

Guidelines for safe operative delivery in the second stage of labour should be developed and adhered to in order to reduce morbidity, particularly neonatal trauma.

 

 Back Home Up Next

 

pregnancy
OPERATIVE DELIVERY
Operative Vaginal Delivery
Forceps
Vacuum Extraction
Caesarean Section