IUGR Intrauterine Growth Restriction
 

IUGR Intrauterine Growth Restriction

   

Intrautrine Growth Restriction - IUGR

Home
Pregnancy Calendar
Pregnancy
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy Date Calculator
Symptoms & Signs
Pregnancy - Antenatal Care
Pregnancy
Gestational Age
Gestational Age Intro
Morning Sickness
Smoking
Obesity
Diabetes in Pregnancy
Gestational Diabetes
Liver
Infections
Teen Pregnancy
Depression in Pregnancy
Headache
PET Definitions
Aetiology - Pre-Eclampsia and Eclampsia
Antepartum Haemorrhage
Intrautrine Growth Restriction - IUGR
Breech Presentation
Twins
Teenage Pregnancy.
Thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy and the puerperium
Premature Labour
Post-Maturity
Induction Of Labour
Planned Delivery
Water Birth
Operative Vaginal Delivery-Forceps Delivery
Vacuum Extraction Delivery
Shoulder Dystocia
Caesarean Section
Obstetric Emergencies
Puerperium
Post-Partum Haemorrhage
Uterine Rupture
Perinatal Mortality
 

INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION

 

Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;82(2):230-6.

Identification of fetal growth retardation: comparison of Doppler waveform indices and serial ultrasound measurements of abdominal circumference and fetal weight.
Chang TC, Robson SC, Spencer JA, Gallivan S.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University College Hospital, London, England.

Objectives:

To compare the serial ultrasound assessment of abdominal circumference (AC) and fetal weight versus single values of umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI) and the aortic-middle cerebral PI ratio in the identification of fetal growth retardation (FGR).

Methods:

Serial AC measurements and estimates of weight were obtained in 104 small fetuses in the third trimester of pregnancy. These serial values (expressed as a change in standard deviation [SD] scores) were compared with the final value of AC and estimated fetal weight (EFW), umbilical artery PI, and the aortic-middle cerebral artery PI ratio (all expressed as SD scores) for their ability to predict a reduced neonatal ponderal index, mid-arm circumference-head circumference (HC) ratio, and skinfold thickness. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were derived and the ultrasound measurements evaluated by calculating the areas under the ROC curves.

Results:

Serial estimates of fetal weight resulted in a significantly larger area under the ROC curve compared with the final aortic-middle cerebral PI ratio in the prediction of an abnormal mid-arm circumference-HC ratio and compared with the final AC, EFW, and umbilical artery PI in the prediction of all neonatal morphometric indices.

Conclusion:

In small fetuses, fetal growth failure as determined by the serial assessment of AC and EFW was superior to the final AC and EFW, umbilical artery PI, and the aortic-middle cerebral PI ratio in the prediction of abnormal neonatal morphometry indicative of FGR.

 

 Back Home Up Next


 

pregnancy