|
INTRAUTERINE
GROWTH RESTRICTION |
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;82(2):230-6.
Identification of fetal growth retardation: comparison of Doppler waveform
indices and serial ultrasound measurements of abdominal circumference and
fetal weight.
Chang TC, Robson SC, Spencer JA, Gallivan S.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University College Hospital,
London, England.
Objectives:
To compare the serial ultrasound assessment of abdominal
circumference (AC) and fetal weight versus single values of umbilical artery
pulsatility index (PI) and the aortic-middle cerebral PI ratio in the
identification of fetal growth retardation (FGR). Methods:
Serial AC
measurements and estimates of weight were obtained in 104 small fetuses in
the third trimester of pregnancy. These serial values (expressed as a change
in standard deviation [SD] scores) were compared with the final value of AC
and estimated fetal weight (EFW), umbilical artery PI, and the aortic-middle
cerebral artery PI ratio (all expressed as SD scores) for their ability to
predict a reduced neonatal ponderal index, mid-arm circumference-head
circumference (HC) ratio, and skinfold thickness. Receiver-operating
characteristic (ROC) curves were derived and the ultrasound measurements
evaluated by calculating the areas under the ROC curves. Results:
Serial
estimates of fetal weight resulted in a significantly larger area under the
ROC curve compared with the final aortic-middle cerebral PI ratio in the
prediction of an abnormal mid-arm circumference-HC ratio and compared with
the final AC, EFW, and umbilical artery PI in the prediction of all neonatal
morphometric indices. Conclusion:
In small fetuses, fetal growth failure as
determined by the serial assessment of AC and EFW was superior to the final
AC and EFW, umbilical artery PI, and the aortic-middle cerebral PI ratio in
the prediction of abnormal neonatal morphometry indicative of FGR.
|