Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Mar;105(3):275-80.
A randomised placebo controlled trial of suppressive acyclovir in late pregnancy
in women with recurrent genital herpes infection.
Brocklehurst P, Kinghorn G, Carney O, Helsen K, Ross E, Ellis E, Shen R, Cowan
F, Mindel A.
Academic Department of Genitourinary Medicine, UCL Medical School, London.
Objectives:
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a suppressive course of
acyclovir in late pregnancy in women with recurrent genital herpes infection on
the incidence of viral shedding, herpes lesion development and caesarean section
for recurrent genital herpes.
Design:
Double-blind, randomised placebo
controlled clinical trial.
Setting:
A department of genitourinary medicine in
Sheffield and an antenatal clinic in London. POPULATION: Pregnant women with
recurrent genital herpes infection at < 36 weeks of gestation.
Methods:
Participating women were given acyclovir 200 mg four times a day (or matching
placebo) from 36 weeks of gestation until the time of delivery. Women were seen
weekly and viral cultures were obtained from the cervix and vulva. Decisions
regarding mode of delivery were left to the discretion of the attending
obstetrician.
Main Outcome Measures:
Delivery by caesarean section for recurrent
genital herpes infection. Number of episodes of recurrent genital herpes
infection and number of episodes of asymptomatic viral shedding during the
treatment period. In addition blood was taken at two weekly intervals to
determine acyclovir levels.
Results:
The total number of women recruited was 63
(31 received acyclovir and 32 received placebo). The number of women undergoing
delivery by caesarean section for recurrent herpes at the time of delivery was
12 (19%). The odds ratio for delivery by caesarean section in women taking
acyclovir, compared with those taking placebo, was 0.44 (95% CI 0.09-1.59). The
odds ratio for clinical recurrences during treatment was 0.10 (95% confidence
interval 0.00-0.86) and the odds ratio for clinical recurrence or asymptomatic
shedding during treatment was 0.32 (95% CI 0.05-1.56).
Conclusion:
This trial
was unable to demonstrate that acyclovir can significantly decrease the number
of caesarean section deliveries; however, the number of clinical recurrences was
significantly reduced. Two episodes of asymptomatic virus shedding both occurred
in women taking acyclovir. At the present time there is little evidence to
suggest that acyclovir should be used outside randomised controlled trials for
the suppression of recurrent genital herpes infection during pregnancy.