Preeclampsia
 

Preeclampsia

   

Pre-Eclampsia and Eclampsia - BP Measurement

Home
Pregnancy Calendar
Pregnancy
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy Date Calculator
Symptoms & Signs
Pregnancy - Antenatal Care
Pregnancy
Gestational Age
Gestational Age Intro
Morning Sickness
Smoking
Obesity
Diabetes in Pregnancy
Gestational Diabetes
Liver
Infections
Teen Pregnancy
Depression in Pregnancy
Headache
PET Definitions
Aetiology - Pre-Eclampsia and Eclampsia
Antepartum Haemorrhage
Intrautrine Growth Restriction - IUGR
Breech Presentation
Twins
Teenage Pregnancy.
Thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy and the puerperium
Premature Labour
Post-Maturity
Induction Of Labour
Planned Delivery
Water Birth
Operative Vaginal Delivery-Forceps Delivery
Vacuum Extraction Delivery
Shoulder Dystocia
Caesarean Section
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Obstetric Emergencies
Puerperium
Post-Partum Haemorrhage
Uterine Rupture
Childbirth
Perinatal Mortality
Breast Feeding
 

PRE-ECLAMPSIA

AND ECLAMPSIA

 

Blood pressure measurement.

 

 

 
 

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Nov;181(5 Pt 1):1203-10

Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric automated blood pressure monitors in the setting of preeclampsia.

  • Natarajan P,

    Shennan AH,

    Penny J,

    Halligan AW,

    de Swiet M,

    Anthony J.

Imperial and King's College, London, United Kingdom.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of 2 automated blood pressure monitors against mercury sphygmomanometry and intra-arterial blood pressure determination in women with preeclampsia.

Study Design:

The auscultatory and oscillometric monitors were compared with mercury sphygmomanometry according to the British Hypertension Society protocol and criteria of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation in a group of 30 women with proteinuric preeclampsia. In addition both monitors were compared with intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in a group of 6 women with severe preeclampsia. The mean (+/- SD) of the differences was calculated and a paired t test was used to compare values obtained with each monitor with intra-arterial measurements.

Results:

Compared with mercury sphygmomanometry the auscultatory QuietTrak monitor markedly underestimated systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 13 +/- 15 mm Hg. The oscillometric SpaceLabs 90207 monitor also underestimated systolic pressure by 10 +/- 10 mm Hg and diastolic pressure by 8 +/- 7 mm Hg. According to the British Hypertension Society grading criteria both monitors achieved the lowest grade (D) for recording systolic and diastolic pressure. The 2 monitors also did not meet the accuracy criteria stipulated by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. Compared with intra-arterial readings the SpaceLabs monitor significantly underestimated systolic and mean arterial pressures (by 19 and 7 mm Hg, respectively, P <. 01). The QuietTrak monitor significantly underestimated systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures (by 25 mm Hg, P <.05, 18 mm Hg, P <.01, and 20 mm Hg, P <.01, respectively).

Conclusion:

Neither monitor can be recommended for clinical use in women with proteinuric preeclampsia.

 

Back Home Up Next

 

pregnancy

PRE-ECLAMPSIA AND ECLAMPSIA

Aetiology
Definitions
Initial assessment
BP Measurement
Proteinuria
Maternal Monitoring
Fetal Assessment
Medication
Prevention
Seizures - Eclampsia
Fluid Balance
Planning Delivery
Post Delivery
Post Discharge
Maternal Mortality