Post-Partum Haemorrhage
 

Post-Partum Haemorrhage

   

Post-Partum Haemorrhage

Home
Pregnancy Calendar
Pregnancy
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Pregnancy Date Calculator
Symptoms & Signs
Pregnancy - Antenatal Care
Pregnancy
Gestational Age
Gestational Age Intro
Morning Sickness
Smoking
Obesity
Diabetes in Pregnancy
Gestational Diabetes
Liver
Infections
Teen Pregnancy
Depression in Pregnancy
Headache
PET Definitions
Aetiology - Pre-Eclampsia and Eclampsia
Antepartum Haemorrhage
Intrautrine Growth Restriction - IUGR
Breech Presentation
Twins
Teenage Pregnancy.
Thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy and the puerperium
Premature Labour
Post-Maturity
Induction Of Labour
Planned Delivery
Water Birth
Operative Vaginal Delivery-Forceps Delivery
Vacuum Extraction Delivery
Shoulder Dystocia
Caesarean Section
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Obstetric Emergencies
Puerperium
Post-Partum Haemorrhage
Uterine Rupture
Childbirth
Perinatal Mortality
Breast Feeding

PUERPERIUM

Post-Partum Haemorrhage

BJOG. 2007 Nov;114(11):1380-7.

Peripartum hysterectomy in the UK: management and outcomes of the associated haemorrhage.
Knight M; UKOSS.

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. marian.knight@npeu.ox. Ac.uk

Objectives:

To identify women undergoing peripartum hysterectomy in the UK and to describe the causes, management and outcome of the associated haemorrhage.

Design:

A population-based descriptive study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS).

Setting:

All 229 hospitals with consultant-led maternity units in the UK. POPULATION: All women in the UK delivering between February 2005 and February 2006.

Methods:

Prospective case identification through the UKOSS monthly mailing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates with 95% CIs. Odds ratio estimates.

Results:

Three hundred and eighteen women underwent peripartum hysterectomy. The most commonly reported causes of haemorrhage were uterine atony (53%) and morbidly adherent placenta (39%). Women were not universally managed with uterotonic therapies. Fifty women were unsuccessfully managed with B-Lynch or other brace suture prior to hysterectomy, 28 with activated factor VII and 9 with arterial embolisation. Twenty-one percent of women suffered damage to other structures, 20% required a further operation and 19% were reported to have additional severe morbidity. Bladder damage was more likely in women with placenta accreta (OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.55-7.48) than in women with uterine atony. There were no significant differences in outcomes between women undergoing total or subtotal hysterectomy. Two women died; case fatality 0.6% (95% CI 0-1.5%).

Conclusions:

For each woman who dies in the UK following peripartum hysterectomy, more than 150 survive. The associated haemorrhage is managed in a variety of ways and not universally according to existing guidelines. Further investigation of the outcomes following some of the more innovative therapies for control of haemorrhage is needed.

Back Home Up Next

 

pregnancy